A Post-liberal Peace: Eirenism and the Everyday

The “liberal peacekeeping” is undergoing a crisis of legitimacy at the level of the everyday in post-conflict environments. In many such environments; different groups often locally constituted perceive it to be ethically bankrupt, subject to double standards, coercive and conditional, acultural, unconcerned with social welfare, and unfeeling and insensitive towards its subjects. It is tied to Western and liberal conceptions of the state, to institutions, and not to the local. Its post-Cold War moral capital, based upon its more emancipatory rather than conservative claims, has been squandered as a result, and its basic goal of a liberal social contract undermined. Certainly, since 9/11, attention has been diverted into other areas and many, perhaps promising peace processes have regressed. This has diverted attention away from a search for refinements, alternatives, for hybrid forms of peace, or for empathetic strategies through which the liberal blueprint for peace might coexist with alternatives. Yet from these strategies a post-liberal peace might emerge via critical research agendas for peacebuilding and for policymaking, termed here, eirenist. This opens up a discussion of an everyday and critical policies for peacebuilding.

13 Replies to “A Post-liberal Peace: Eirenism and the Everyday”

  1. Pingback: water fountain
  2. Pingback: gazibo
  3. Pingback: ozempic
  4. Pingback: ????????????????
  5. Pingback: ltobet
  6. Pingback: ????????
  7. Pingback: BAU
  8. Pingback: r6s unknown
  9. Pingback: SKY Wind
  10. Pingback: view coupons
  11. Pingback: sa??????

Comments are closed.