Iraq: The Contradictions of Exogenous State-building in Historical Perspective

This article compares Britain’s failed attempt at building a stable, liberal state in Iraq from 1914 to 1932 with the USA’s struggle to stabilise the country after regime change in April 2003. It sets out a template for endogenous state-building based on the evolution of the European state system. It then compares this to exogenous extra-European state-building after both World War I and the Cold War. It focuses on three key stages: the imposition of order, the move from coercive to administrative capacity and finally the evolution of a collective civic identity linked to the state. It is this process against which Iraqi state-building by the British in the 1920s and by the USA from 2003 onwards can be accurately judged to have failed. For both the British and American occupations, troop numbers were one of the central problems undermining the stability of Iraq. British colonial officials never had the resources to transform the despotic power deployed by the state into sustainable infrastructural capacity. Instead they relied on hakumat al tayarra (government by aircraft). The dependence upon air power led to the neglect of other state institutions, stunting the growth of infrastructural power and hence state legitimacy. The US occupation has never managed to impose despotic power, having failed to obtain a monopoly over the collective deployment of violence. Instead it has relied on ‘indigenisation,’ the hurried creation of a new Iraqi army. The result has been the security vacuum that dominates the south and centre of the country. The article concludes by suggesting that unsuccessful military occupations usually end after a change of government in the intervening country. This was the case for the British in May 1929 and may well be the case for the USA after the next presidential election in 2008.

292 Replies to “Iraq: The Contradictions of Exogenous State-building in Historical Perspective”

  1. How effective is clomiphene in treating female infertility? To women who are rightly treated with Clomid, there are scads benefits: It’s a cost-effective treatment repayment for infertility, signally when compared with other treatments like IVF. Clomid is an vocal medication, which makes it less invasive than other treatments. It can be prescribed around your OB-GYN or embryonic be fond of provider, as a substitute for of needing to go to a reproductive

  2. The takeaway. best viagra over the counter, sildenafil citrate, works the done as Viagra, but at a lop off cost. While Pfizer assuage manufactures the “petty vulgar pill,” other companies, globally and in the Joint States, frame viagra without a doctors approval funny fake viagra prescription label template free that may look different but is still an operative treatment against erectile

  3. Is viagra generic 50mg inauspicious for your heart. While buy generic viagra best generic viagra is more by many known in the interest of ration genital blood vessels swell to uphold an erection and, more recently, as a treatment instead of pulmonary hypertension, it has been design to own inadequate point the way effect on the vulnerable heart.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.