Private, Armed and Humanitarian? States, NGOs, International Private Security Companies and Shifting Humanitarianism

The article contends that, in the light of contemporary challenges, states are not only changing the meaning of the word `humanitarian’, but are also creating an expanding marketplace that includes international private security companies (PSCs) in the delivery of humanitarian assistance. Three types of factors – supply, demand, and ideational – have led to this development. On the supply side, state-demanded limitations on the private employment of violence and reduced commercial opportunities in Iraq have called for PSC diversification. On the demand side, states increasingly wish for non-state partners that are comfortable with their involvement in integrated solutions, something that PSCs, rather than nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), are more willing to embrace. On the ideational side, NGOs are concerned that humanitarian endeavour is losing its neutral and impartial status in order to facilitate counterinsurgency, `hearts and minds’ activities. PSCs, in contrast, are content with the partial delivery of assistance and likely will continue to be so given, in large part, the experiences of their personnel.

21 Replies to “Private, Armed and Humanitarian? States, NGOs, International Private Security Companies and Shifting Humanitarianism”

  1. Pingback: positive jazz
  2. Pingback: casino
  3. Pingback: about his
  4. Pingback: texas psilocybin
  5. Pingback: beef export
  6. Pingback: ?????????????????
  7. Pingback: b52
  8. Pingback: ???????????
  9. Pingback: ?????
  10. Pingback: 789sexy
  11. Pingback: coupon codes
  12. Pingback: adswar.shop
  13. Pingback: join Herbalife
  14. Pingback: Pharmaceutics
  15. Pingback: Nexus Market
  16. Pingback: ???????????

Comments are closed.